Dry Cooling Tower vs. Wet Cooling Tower
This comparison highlights the key differences:
Feature | Dry Cooling Tower | Wet Cooling Tower |
Principle | Sensible Heat Transfer (like a radiator) | Evaporative Cooling (latent heat) |
Water Usage | Minimal to zero (only for minor makeup) | Very High (constant evaporation and blow down) |
Cooling Efficiency | Lower; limited by the dry-bulb temperature of the air | Higher; enhanced by the wet-bulb temperature of the air |
Energy Consumption | Higher (requires massive fans and more surface area) | Lower (fans are smaller, pumps handle water) |
Visible Plume | None | Yes (a white cloud of water vapor) |
Capital Cost | Higher (due to more expensive materials – finned tubes) | Lower |
Operating Cost | Lower water cost, higher energy cost | High water cost, lower energy cost |
Environmental Impact | Conserves water, no drift (chemical discharge) | High water consumption, potential for drift |