Tipo Heat Exchangers Manufacturers, Cooling Towers Manufacturers, and Industrial Chillers Manufacturers

Pultruded cooling tower Manufacturer in Bahrain

Pultruded FRP vs. Galvanized Steel: Key Comparison for Cooling Towers & Industrial Applications

When choosing between pultruded Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) and galvanized steel for cooling towers, structural supports, or corrosive environments, several factors must be considered—corrosion resistance, weight, strength, cost, and long-term performance. Below is a detailed comparison.

1. Corrosion Resistance

MaterialPerformance in Corrosive Environments
Pultruded FRP◉ Excellent – No rust, even in saltwater, chlorine, or acidic fumes. Resistant to chemicals, UV (if coated), and microbial growth.
Galvanized Steel◉ Limited – Zinc coating protects against rust, but scratches, weld points, and prolonged chemical exposure lead to corrosion. Requires maintenance.

Winner: FRP (Ideal for cooling towers, wastewater plants, marine applications.)

2. Strength & Weight

PropertyPultruded FRPGalvanized Steel
Tensile Strength30,000–50,000 psi50,000–80,000 psi
Weight1/4th of steel (~1.8 g/cm³)Heavy (~7.8 g/cm³)
Strength-to-Weight RatioHigher (Better for lightweight structures)Lower
Stiffness (Modulus of Elasticity)~3–6 Msi (Less rigid than steel)~29 Msi (More rigid)

Winner:

3. Durability & Lifespan

FactorPultruded FRPGalvanized Steel
Lifespan in Harsh Conditions30-50+ years (No corrosion)10-25 years (Depends on coating integrity)
Maintenance NeedsNone (No painting, sealing, or rust treatment)Regular inspections, recoating, weld repairs
Impact ResistanceGood (but can crack under extreme impact)Better (ductile, dents rather than shatters)

Winner: FRP (Lower lifecycle cost, zero maintenance.)

4. Thermal & Electrical Properties

PropertyPultruded FRPGalvanized Steel
Thermal ConductivityLow (Good insulator)High (Conductive, can transfer heat/cold)
Electrical ConductivityNon-conductive (Safe near electrical systems)Conductive (Risk of galvanic corrosion)

Winner: FRP (Better for electrical insulation and thermal efficiency.)

5. Installation & Fabrication

FactorPultruded FRPGalvanized Steel
Ease of InstallationLightweight, easy to handleHeavy, requires cranes/lifting equipment
Machining & JoiningRequires adhesives/FRP fasteners (no welding)Easily welded, bolted, or riveted
CustomizationPultrusion allows custom profilesEasily fabricated on-site

Winner:

6. Cost Comparison

FactorPultruded FRPGalvanized Steel
Initial CostHigher (~1.5–3x steel)Lower
Installation CostLower (lightweight, faster)Higher (heavy, welding, corrosion prep)
Maintenance CostNegligibleHigh (painting, rust removal, replacements)
Lifecycle Cost (20+ yrs)Lower (No replacements)Higher (frequent upkeep)

Winner: FRP for long-term savings, steel for upfront budget projects.

7. Best Applications for Each Material

Choose Pultruded FRP When:

◉ Cooling towers (chemical plants, marine environments)
◉ Water treatment plants (chlorine resistance)
◉ Electrical & telecom structures (non-conductive)
◉ Walkways, ladders, railings in corrosive zones

Choose Galvanized Steel When:

◉ High-load structures (e.g., heavy industrial frames)

◉ Short-term projects with budget constraints
◉ Non-corrosive or dry environments
◉ Where welding/modifications are needed

Final Verdict: Which One to Choose?

FactorPultruded FRP WinsGalvanized Steel Wins
Corrosion Resistance
Weight◉ (Lightweight)◉ (Heavy)
Strength◉ (Lower than steel)◉ (Higher rigidity)
Durability◉ (30-50+ years)◉ (10-25 years)
Maintenance◉ (Zero)◉ (High)
Cost (Long-Term)◉ (Cheaper over time)◉ (Higher upkeep)

For cooling towers, chemical plants, and marine applications, FRP is the superior choice.
For heavy load-bearing structures in dry environments, galvanized steel may suffice.